| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
top_img
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Commun Sci Disord. 2025;30(1): 178-191.
Published online March 31, 2025.
doi: https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.250102
Comparing Lexical Retrieval Processing in People with Alzheimer’s Disease, Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus, and Parkinson’s Disease to Healthy Older Adults
Na-Hyeon Baea , Ye-Jin Janga , Nayeon Kimb , Ki-Su Parkc ,d , Kyunghun Kange , Janghyeok Yoonf , and Ji-Wan Hag
aDepartment of Speech and Language Pathology, Graduate School of Rehabilitation, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, Korea
bAI Lab, Neopons Inc., Daegu, Korea
cDepartment of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
dNeopons Inc., Daegu, Korea
eDepartment of Neurology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
fDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
gDepartment of Speech and Language Pathology, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, Korea
Corresponding Author: Ji-Wan Ha ,Tel: +82-53-850-4327, Fax: +82-53-850-4329, Email: jw-ha@daegu.ac.kr
Received January 20, 2025  Revised: March 16, 2025   Accepted March 27, 2025
Share :  
ABSTRACT
Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine whether multifaceted analyses of a lexical retrieval task can provide meaningful information for the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH), and Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Methods
A total of 41 patients diagnosed with AD, NPH, or PD and 16 healthy elderly adults (HE) were tested on a lexical retrieval task. Response scores, response times, error types, and the percentage of errors resolved were compared across groups, and a correlation analysis with the Korean Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) was performed.
Results
First, the AD, NPH, and PD groups had significantly fewer correct responses and significantly more incorrect responses than the HE group. The PD group made significantly more incorrect responses than the AD group. Second, the AD, NPH, PD group had significantly slower reaction times for correct responses than the HE group. Third, all four groups showed significantly more semantic errors than other error types, and the least were mixed errors. Fourth, the three patient groups were significantly less able to monitor and correct errors than the HE group. Fifth, the K-MMSE score was significantly positively correlated with the number of correct responses and negatively correlated with the number of incorrect responses, semantic errors, and unrelated errors.
Conclusion
We suggest that the lexical retrieval task can be effectively used to screen patients with AD, NPH, and PD from HE, and explore its potential for differential diagnosis.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease | Normal pressure hydrocephalus | Parkinson’s disease | Lexical retrieval | Response time | Error types | Error resolved
Editorial office contact information
Department of Speech-Language Pathology,
Korea Nazarene University, 48 Wolbong-ro, Seobuk-gu, Cheonan 31172, Korea

Tel: +82-502-196-1996   Fax: +82-53-359-6780   E-mail: kjcd@kasa1986.or.kr

Copyright © by Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology.
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Developed in M2PI