ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
Commun Sci Disord. 2008;13(3): 513-523.
|
Evaluation of Exaggerated Hearing Loss Using Objective Audiometry |
Seung-Deok Heo`
, Jae-Myeong Lee`
, Ji-Sang Park`
, Ah-Hyun Choi`
, and Myung-Koo Kang`
|
|
|
Copyright ©2008 The Korean Academy of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology |
허승덕(Seung-Deok Heo)| 이재명(Jae-Myeong Lee)| 박지상(Ji-Sang Park)| 최아현(Ah-Hyun Choi)| 강명구(Myung-Koo Kang) |
Share :
|
ABSTRACT |
Background & Objectives This study was performed to investigate the rate of malingering deafness and to predict the degree of exaggerated-hearing loss using pattern of response of pure tone audiometry(PTA), speech audiometry(SA) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) in subjects with a purpose of socioeconomic benefit. Methods We reviewed the medical records of 54 subjects. The subjects were divided into the malingering group and the control group in accordance with pattern of response. These results were analyzed statistically. Results The responded-thresholds of ascending and descending methods in 1 kHz between the malingering group and the control group were significantly different. The differences between 2 PTAs(pure tone averages between 0.5 and 1kHz) and SRT(speech reception threshold) (P < .001), ABR threshold and high 3 PTAs(pure tone averages between 0.5, 1 and 2kHz) (P = .002), ABR threshold and SRT (P < .001) were statistically significant. Discussion & Conclusion It was concluded that the rate of malingering deafness was 84.48%, and the degree of exaggerated-hearing loss was 34.48dB respondedthreshold of ascending method. |
Keywords:
사청 | 과대 난청 | 순음청력검사 | 어음청력검사 | 청성뇌간유발반응 | malingering | exaggerate hearing loss |
|
|
|